March 2, 2009
I had kids write short memoirs recently, practicing the kind of reflective, analytical thought of which they’ll need to do more and more as the years go on. “What did you learn from this?” I kept asking them.
“I didn’t learn ANYTHING, Ms. S,” they say, eyes wide and perplexed.
“Every powerful memory we have has taught us something. What did this experience teach you?” I counter.
They slouch down in the conferencing chair, eyes unfocusing, casting their brains back into the past, when they were eight, nine, four years old. Then the light comes on. They sit up and announce triumphantly something like this, for example:
“It taught me not to be afraid of new things. Because, like,” they continue, “Sometimes…you can do something…and once you get into it, it’s not bad. Sometimes it’s….even fun!”
Now, cast these tidbits into a sea of more experienced writers, and you will hear as much as see the upturned noses. That’s boring. Trite. Stupid. “Try something new, it may not be so bad?” Everyone knows that.
Except for the fact that these kids don’t. For real.
My Earth Science friend Joseph, down the hall, has tussled with this in terms of the experiments he asks kids to do. “Is seeing what material floats or sinks in Coke real science? They’re not doing or discovering anything we don’t know already.”
“Yeah,” I say, “But they don’t know it. Isn’t it real science to them?”
Where should our unending search as adults for novelty as quality, for the idolatry of excitement, grind to a halt for just a moment? Where should it give way to delight in the continual rebirth, in each mind, of that which is simply good?
I think it’s with our kids. I think it’s seventh grade.
March 2nd, 2009 at 6:22 pm
Spot on! I very rarely find blog posts truely inspiring, but this one really made me think. I’ll look at my students differently tomorrow. Thanks
March 2nd, 2009 at 7:37 pm
I think this is mostly right. I say mostly because I think that something leaves our students after middle school. I’m not sure if you’ve ever taught high school, but the kids know that what they’re doing is disingenuous. At what point to we move from the canned to the authentic?
March 3rd, 2009 at 10:24 am
It seems so obvious, but I never made it part of my self talk. “Just because you know this to be true, does not mean your students do.” Maybe I do not have to come up with something new and fresh every day. What I have may be fresh and new to them already.
Thanks for the food for thought.
March 4th, 2009 at 10:39 am
We suffer from the Curse of Knowledge, and while I agree with you, I’d argue that it knows no grade.
There are the ‘uh, well, yeah’ and ‘no, duh!’ moments when students begin to reach an understanding about existentialism (during senior year), but you’re right that educators needs to recognize our own schema as distinctly separate from the developing ones in our students.
Because we’ve learned, we’ve experienced, so nothing about our content seems revelatory and awe-inspiring.
It’s a five-year average for most teachers, right?
March 4th, 2009 at 9:42 pm
But our content IS revelatory and awe-inspiring! Just this week I found out I am way behind on the story of lactic acid, know nothing about the chemistry of bromthyol blue, and you can stick tomato cuttings in the ground and they can grow (has not been tested in my experimental arena!)
And this all came from my students… now on to the question of is la chupacabra really just a mangy fox…
March 6th, 2009 at 6:58 pm
Interesting. Its very ture though. I remember doing a lesson about color with kindergardens. I put blue and yellow together and got green, something I had done hundreds and hundreds of times
But they were soo amazed with what I had just done. I had two colors, and now I have a completely different color! To them it was nearly magical.
Nice article
March 8th, 2009 at 9:33 pm
I teach middle school too, and I have noticed that when students say “I don’t know” when we ask them to think for themselves it means “I don’t know what you are thinking, so I don’t know the answer” They think that the answers are in the teachers’ head and if they don’t know what the teacher is thinking, then they don’t know “the answer”. Once they learn that they can trust their own thinking, they often open up and start sharing their thoughts more readily.