May 12, 2009
The comments on my last post, and some email I brazenly (desperately?) solicited, have been really helpful. Here’s a few quotes that I’ve been repeating to myself. (If you’re not mentioned, worry not: everyone’s words have made a deep impact, and I’m very grateful.)
Deborah Meier sent me a kind note.
We need to belong to some “community” – to be part of a shared effort – to find the classroom and the struggle to change our circumstances both–at least part of the time–a source of comfort, excitement, even pleasure!
Deborah understands the need for community on the lonely and draining walk of school reform. I’m lucky to have some of that. But she makes clear that I can’t subsist on crumbs forever. I need more. We need more.
Chris Lehman, teacher and principal of the stellar alternative Science Learning Academy in Philadephia, reminds me of this:
Trying to be Rafe Esquith or Debbie Meier is a good goal, but only if we don’t beat ourselves up when we fall short… teaching is a marathon, not a sprint. We desperately need wise, kind, thoughtful people who make this a career and a life.
And we need to forgive ourselves when we aren’t perfect or awesome or “A-game” every day. When the people who care leave because we cannot measure up to our ideal version of ourselves, in the end, that’s bad for our schools and our kids.
Chris walks his talk, and highlights my lifelong tendency towards a kind of moral impatience with myself: if I can’t make everything right right now, I must be failing. This is an illusory approach to education at best. Should I wonder that most of my heroes have spent decades doing what they do? If I mean to accomplish something useful as a teacher, I’ve got to be in it for the long haul.
Bill Cala, former superintendent of two local districts and well-known for his protest against military recruitment practices built into NCLB, his current efforts to begin a reformed school on the campus of Nazareth College (my alma mater), and his educational foundation in Kenya, says this to me.
The system is the rock of Sisyphus… If we do not fight, if we do not push to change the system, public education is dead. The more people who leave teaching and do not stay to fight the system, the sooner the demise of public education. Stay and fight!!
Yeah, he included those two exclamation points. Can’t beat a rallying cry from someone you trust implicitly.
And finally, my colleague Joseph, who is leaving school to pursue a Ph.D. in education reform, comments:
There may be a day when I regret this decision, but I don’t think so. I’d rather put my energy into developing other models of public education that work to really engage kids in their passions and don’t promote alienation from their environment and communities.
It has been a privilege to work with this gifted teacher. His words bring home to me that I also cannot be content unless I am involved– full time– in a solution to education’s ills: one that will someday allow people such as Joe to stay in the classroom and thrive there.
To sum it all up, I’ve finally realized that trying to reform schools, simultaneously with surviving those same broken schools, isn’t sustainable for me– morally, mentally, or physically.
So how do I put all this into practice?
I’ve come to a number of conclusions.
1) As many people have wisely suggested, I need to keep my eyes peeled for employment as a teacher in alternative education settings, ones that more closely align with what we know is effective pedagogy. Charter and public schools come first; superlative and accessible private schools a distant second. (And Dave, I deeply appreciate your kind words, but I will be a principal when hell freezes over.
)
2) That being said, while I am looking, I also need to recognize the benefits of- and maximize– my current setting. The kids are diverse, the colleagues are smart and caring, the schedule supports teaming, my principal gets excited about thinking out of the box, and I have very high hopes for my new subject director. So I use this healthy stuff to the nth degree for the benefit of kids, and…
3)… make an utter pain in the ass of myself in matters that smack of anything else. This scares me. I am a natural introvert from way, way back. But I have no other choice.
4) Sooner rather than later, I need to get back to school for my own Ph.D. I’ve wanted to do this since third grade (no joke) but my focus has clarified in the past few days. My doctorate in education can’t be about investigating some esoteric realm of learning that only adds to the pile of knowledge that teachers don’t have the time or resources to implement. It has to be about change: what works in schools, and how to make it happen.
I don’t think I have to give up my first love, though. I have a kernel of an idea that true literacy can not actually exist without effective school systems. The more we demonstrate that a healthy school system is not tangential to, but indivisible from good learning, the better.
Charles Payne, author of So Much Reform, So Little Change, also shared these two burning questions of his with me.
How do we create trust in distrusting environments? How do we change negative teacher beliefs?
And that, I think, also may be at the heart of the matter. Not just an inevitable movement towards developing reformed schools from scratch– although this is certainly what ought to be done in some quarters. Instead consider this: what can we do to re-create trust and health in the wounded school systems that already exist?
Read this attempt at an answer. Try to ignore that it didn’t work for the moment, weird as that sounds. Its foundations are a solid indication, I think, of where we need to go in response to Dr. Payne.
So in the end? With some trepidation, I guess I’m still in the game.
May 12th, 2009 at 10:20 pm
Yay. Inexplicably relieved to read this, on several levels. Might try to explain why another time.
May 13th, 2009 at 7:37 am
It’s because you think America’s going to hell in a hand basket. Admit it, you Norwegian snob.
May 13th, 2009 at 3:02 pm
This post really resonated with frustrations I’ve been having recently as well. I’m in a new school with less “community” than I’ve been accustomed to. I’m feeling frustrated that my instruction isn’t as tight as it was last year (I’m teaching new courses this year, of course), and that everywhere I look are places the school needs someone to make themselves an “utter pain in the ass” to improve the existing culture & practice.
Sometimes I need that reminder that:
My instruction may not be where I want it to be now, but it is pretty good, and it’ll keep improving.
I can’t hold myself responsible for changing the culture of the system in one year (or even over several years)- I can continue to keep questioning why it is we’re doing the things we’re doing. Like you I’m not a natural pain in the ass. I’ll have to work at it.
Thanks for sharing the quips from Meier & Lehmann. Chris’ quote was pretty much exactly what I needed to hear when I read this post: You’ll suck some days & that’s okay. Remember the kids. Keep working- it gets better.
May 13th, 2009 at 3:36 pm
Dina, your post made me cry. Please hang in there, honey. It’s people like you who are the hope of this messed-up system.
May 13th, 2009 at 3:45 pm
I feel misunderstood. Some kind of cultural difference probably.
May 13th, 2009 at 7:36 pm
(I’m here because I follow Ben’s tweets…)
Thoughts worth thinking, all. Especially towards the end of a rough year.
I was mentioning to my co-teacher today that one of my undergraduate mentors is currently president of Quest University. Its gimmick, if you will, is that students only take one course at a time, three hours a day for three and a half weeks. I would love to have that level of focus from (and for) my high school students…
May 14th, 2009 at 9:55 am
@jsb: welcome. Tweets about my posts always freak me out (nicely). Quest looks really, really intriguing. I wonder how you might propose a tiny seedling way to duplicate their structure in your school. Don’t think big yet.
(And according to the pictures, one of their lecturers seems to be Gandalf the Grey. Can’t beat that.)
@Ben: I will make you my pain in the ass buddy if you will make me yours. We could send each other pain in the ass accountability reports once a month. I’m kind of not kidding…
@Hadass: I’m the only one who’s supposed to be crying over all this! Thanks for the support.
May 15th, 2009 at 8:06 pm
@jsb: My alma mater (Calvin College) has an “Interim” in January between the fall & spring semesters that is pretty much the exact format you describe. Just one class for three to four hours a day. Interim was pretty well loved by all. I’m not sure if the format would be less loved if that was the norm, but it’s an interesting concept to consider.
@Dina: Here’s my PITAU (pain-in-the-ass update): I just got approved to lead a PD session on familiarizing teachers with online tools, which means I’ll be explicitly sharing my blog with staff members. That’d be no biggie except I’ve written a fair number of posts that are critical of the school culture. I think the critiques are fair, but I’m a little nervous about colleagues seeing them. Also, I have my first and only post-observation meeting with the “science curriculum coordinator” next week and I plan on expressing my disappointment that she’s only been in my room twice all year- both formal observations done within one week of each other.
Nothing too shocking or in-your-face, but I’ve decided at the least not to passively let things slide.
May 16th, 2009 at 7:58 am
Nice, Ben. Start small. I will certainly be.
What’s your contract say about number of observations, deadlines etc?
I recently sent the HR director of our district the post I wrote on losing paid days to be present at my father’s death. His answer was…unsatisfactory. We just negotiated a new contract that covers leave, so there’s no current means to change the policy. However, I am thinking very carefully about how to do so in the future. Perhaps a presentation to admin including an anonymous survey of teachers indicating the “abuse” rate on the use of leave due to the policy’s stringent requirements? It has to be shockingly high.
May 17th, 2009 at 8:00 am
[...] posts hit you exactly when and where you need to be hit. Dina over at The Line wrote a post that did just that recently. In a new school where I’m not exactly enthralled with the [...]
May 17th, 2009 at 10:10 pm
I’m thinking of the question you asked earlier: should you continue to teach?
We New Orleanians pride ourselves on being straightforward. There are some wonderful folks on this blog with thoughts that are quite reflective. Unfortunately, I didn’t find that many of the responses got to the heart of your question.
Funny thing about humans: our intentions are so often good, but we approach from the Burger King perspective- we want to do it our way, or it’s no good. We tend to visualize how we want to make an impact, and if things pan out that way, then we did, if they don’t pan out the way we envisioned, then we assume we are making no difference.
I think back to Clarence the Angel in the movie, “It’s a Wonderful Life.” He shows George Bailey that his life was so much more than George thought it was. I believe as teachers we need to step back and look at the big picture, and perhaps we shall discover that our impact on the students (and even education itself) is much more than we thought it to be.
As a first year special education administrator after teaching h.s. special ed. for 26 years, I can get frustrated by the roadblocks to effective teaching and making sure student learning is taking place. I see the teachers I supervise get frustrated, much like I used to as a teacher myself. However, I believe “should I stay or should I go” comes down to one very basic question: is there evidence to believe that I am no longer making a difference? Notice I did not say “Am I making a difference the way I WANT to or the way I think I SHOULD?”
Our visions are not always the best. We want results, we want optimum student learning, but as I see my students years later, some who left by dropping out, I see young men and ladies who have become a success. Can I say I had a little something to do with that? They say I did. Did I get the result I wanted? No. Did I make a difference that helped them in some way to achieve goals they eventually set for themselves? Absolutely.
Final point: I wouldn’t leave. You seem to be just what the kids need. We don’t have to have it “our way” to be successful.
May 20th, 2009 at 2:20 pm
Our contract requires us to be observed 3 times during the school year until we’re tenured. I believe then it goes down to once. I’m not personally a big fan of “formal” observations. I think it’d be more effective for the observer to drop in once a week for even just a few minutes. At least then they’d get a good idea of who I am as a teacher and how I relate to my students. I don’t think that happens now.
Jim, I think you make a good point. Our real impact with students is a tough metric to comprehend. Our success at changing the system is (IMHO) an easier thing to measure. If we’re wailing away at an ineffective system that refuses to acknowledge us there’s a point where we break down, burn out, and move on.
May 20th, 2009 at 11:06 pm
It is tough wailing away at the system, Ben. It can burn us out if we get frustrated by the futility of it all, no question.
I think I somehow managed to keep at it as a high school special education teacher for 26 years by changing how I could impact the students- taking on the 504 Coordinator’s position, (a PITA, but a great chance to impact the kids) chairing RTI, and even holding game-time at lunch for any students who wanted to come in. (Great for those who didn’t “fit in” anywhere) Even though I usually ran into a brick wall when I tried to effect change, I always felt that I could make a difference in the lives of the students, at least on some level in every case. To me, that is what kept me going.
My ultimate frustration was with an old-boy network that admired my ideas, but ultimately didn’t take them seriously. Hence, after 26 years, I left the classroom for an administrative position where I am in a position to listen to the special education teachers, support them, and try to help them effect the change they want to bring.
May 27th, 2009 at 11:53 am
This last exchange of comments has been humbling and thought-provoking for me, Jim and Ben. Thank you.
Part of the problem, of course, is exactly that except in very rare cases, teachers’ professionalism is not recognized or supported. If I knew I had collegiate control in my building’s decision-making, could challenge myself professionally, AND NOT LEAVE THE CLASSROOM, the questions in my post would not be nearly as urgent.
As it is…
It’s instructive, and deeply important, to think about a wider sphere of influence than just structural change. I think Jim’s right that this is what keeps him– and maybe most other veterans?– inside the insane working conditions of teaching.
However, I have come to loathe pat, superficial dismissal of structural concerns with the related phrase “just do it for the kids”– with the assumption that if you don’t just lie down and take what you’re given, you are merely being selfish. I’ve reflected on this before.
http://theline.edublogs.org/2008/05/20/the-real-problem-with-passion/
NOT saying that this is what is happening here. Only that the Stockholm Syndrome isn’t going to get us anywhere in education.
June 25th, 2009 at 5:46 pm
PS. If I was overly nosy here, that’s why.