May 21, 2009
One of my best buds David (amongst many others) just got his iPhone. As a computer geek and technical writer, it was only a matter of time for him; as it seems to be for, well, just about everyone on the planet, according to Apple. After my Palm Pilot blew over Spring Break, even I was eyeing it. Sleek as a seal, literally a jewel of a thing, no question; and with apps that can balance your checkbook and recognize snippets of music over the radio, what are we all waiting for?
I think I might be waiting for a spring breeze. And just what I mean by that, I am still figuring out.
For example, you can’t argue with me about the iPhone’s appeal to the naturalist, because I agree. Peterson’s Guide to North American Birds smaller than your hand? Identify constellations from the photo lens? I know. With so many places it could slip unobtrusively into my backcountry pack, it’s hard to contain the drool.
And yet, and yet. Isn’t there a time when even bringing a book along on a hike– much less a book on crack like the iPhone– actually draws your attention away from…simple…observing? From simple, visceral experience? The cataloging, the identifying, the compartmentalizing, the defining; doesn’t the din of the mind move us away, at last, and maybe permanently, from the fundamental reality of our senses? When I rush to pin my virtual map up against the stars, doesn’t it, in the end, block them out?
Schooling comes into this in several ways. One (and again): an uncritical love affair with technology does nothing for our students. If we do not give them the tools to see that every gain we make with technology takes something else away– something we may need very badly– then we leave them mired in the worship of what Neil Postman called “the god of technology,” a Faustian bargain at best:
Ask anyone who knows something about computers to talk about them, and you will find that they will, unabashedly and relentlessly, extol the wonders of computers. You will also find that in most cases they will completely neglect to mention any of the liabilities of computers. This is a dangerous imbalance, since the greater the wonders of a technology, the greater will be its negative consequences…
Perhaps the best way I can express this idea is to say that the question, “What will a new technology do?” is no more important than the question, “What will a new technology undo?” Indeed, the latter question is more important, precisely because it is asked so infrequently.
Ask it, friends. As educators, we must ask it.
(This quote from what should be required reading for every educator, Postman’s mind-blowing lecture “Five Things We Need to Know About Technological Change.” )
Second, we must recognize that school, in its very essence, also moves us inexorably away from visceral experience. Simply by placing a premium on reading and writing, it does so. This is not my thesis– that honor belongs to David Abram– but it is my belief, confirmed in experience, and it bugs me more and more with each passing day. Yes, this is the English teacher talking.
Yet hopelessly and irrevocably in love with words, I actually wonder if this doesn’t put me in the correct place to criticize their overuse. For if our education becomes a serpent biting its own tail– reading and writing about, well, reading and writing– then what are we actually reading and writing about? What are we really learning?
The whole thing seems to crumble, like a coal self-consumed; one push with a stick, and the ash collapses and blows away.
This is a lot to pile on the poor little iPhone, and you’ll note that I’m not actually placing the fate of the world on its delicate silver shoulders; that, too, would be overestimating its importance.
But there’s that spring breeze, though, moving through the room, or my daughter’s laugh. Hip-deep in apps, I may easily miss them both.
And it just gets easier and easier, doesn’t it.

May 22nd, 2009 at 6:58 am
You’re really starting to get funny whenever a new technology emerges. You reject it prima facie, and then eventually come around. Blogging, facebook, and now this. Look, I completely agree with you on the lack of sensory awareness. I’ve noticed myself losing that too. But it’s all about balance, isn’t it? The odd thing is that since I picked up my iPhone, I sit in front of my computer way less. I’m out and about much more, with the phone mostly sleeping in my pocket. It’s nice to know that I have it if I need it, but I don’t really ever “need” it. It’s still just a chunk of plastic and metal when it comes down to it. And that’s what I’ve been teaching the kids as well.
I’m looking forward to the day when we reject all this modern stuff and go back to the romantic time of hunter-gatherers.
May 22nd, 2009 at 8:38 am
Joe: What does a technology *undo*? Shouldn’t that be our first question? It should be mine, regardless of whether I “come around”– a deceptively vague phrase anyway, since (for example) I have to set the timer on my oven to make sure fifteen minutes on Facebook doesn’t become an hour and a half where I’ve said to my kids, “Hang on a second” a dozen times, truncated their reading time, and missed the sunset. Same goes for blogging. To this day I don’t know if entertaining such risks is really healthy, even if I reap great benefits from both technologies.
I don’t think anything in this post rejects the iPhone outright; quite the contrary. But again, I would ask myself what possessing an iPhone– or any new technology– has the potential to undo. Yeah, we’re not sitting on our asses in front of a laptop. That’s one of the things portable tech does. But we now also have the potential to be physically in contact with a computer *100% of the time*. That’s one of the things it undoes.
Without some seriously disciplined reflection and action, this continued and increasing proximity to tech will erode and shift our sense of what we think we “need,” fast. It already has. (Six years ago, I only got a cell phone because I was pregnant. Now I can’t live without it. I’m not going to call that an unqualified good by any means.)
Such things, at the very least, should give all of us pause.
May 22nd, 2009 at 9:14 am
Hit the wrong button, my apologies: Sean Morris left a comment stating that my blog posts are unsophisticated. He feels I am speaking about intimacy with nature and humans “on a deeper level” (but not deeply enough, I presume?). He also feels that my reflections only are accurate if tech is being used to help us “escape our state”. The presupposition is that a lack of intimacy via tech, and tech-influenced escapism, are not problems for everyone. They are specifically not problems for Sean, he states. I hope I’ve got all that right. Come back and repost, Sean, if I’ve missed anything.
Sean, I think you’re spot-on about tech questions regarding both intimacy and escapism. I also think those questions are vastly more widespread and pertinent than you imply. Certainly, as you can see from my response to Joe, they are the most pertinent ones for me.
I’d have to leave it to the readers to determine the sophistication of such questions for themselves. My only real concern is if my questions are honest. If they are, seeking their answers critically and openly can only lead me where I need to go– and, with a little luck, can be helpful to others along the way.
May 27th, 2009 at 9:09 am
If you haven’t seen The Story of Stuff then you should check it out. I’d love to hear your thoughts, as I think it directly relates to your views in this post.
May 27th, 2009 at 11:17 am
That very movie was recommended to me just last week, Ken. I’m excited about watching it, and the possibility of working it into curriculum (Lord knows, for at least the ten girls each year who overtly align their identity with shopping.)
May 28th, 2009 at 1:57 pm
I think the argument that technology subtracts as much as it adds is sort of a dead end. Every new technology provides a new tool in the world’s toolbelt, and it permanently ends the universe where that tool did not exist. If we assume that the value of the addition and the subtraction are the same (which somebody will certainly disagree with me on, with good reason), then we end up basically where we started.
The underlying question, eventually, is why do anything? Why do we learn to make things and then make things and then sell those things? So we can buy more things? It’s kind of an existential question; my time here is limited, what should I do with it?
In my opinion, sitting on a rock on the side of a mountain and sitting in Starbucks with a laptop (with The Line open, of course) are both good places to contemplate our role in it all.
May 28th, 2009 at 5:35 pm
OMFG. Stupid internetz ate my comment.
Short and snappy: So a new tech changes the universe forever. So what? Every life changes the universe – some in ways that are more noticeable to us than others.
It’s a choice. If you want, turn it off.
Do you know of any schools that teach reading and writing and exclude everything else?
May 29th, 2009 at 8:33 am
Something tells me I’m going to regret this, but you only live once!
All technology makes our life easier. (When it’s working) On many levels, thank God for it. We couldn’t be doing this if it weren’t for technology.
My problem is when the line between master/servant is blurred to the point that we can no longer tell the difference. For instance, if heaven forbid something were to happen that would shut down all computer systems even for just 24 hours, our world would come to a screeching halt and arguably even lives would be changed. I’m not sure I like this. I distinctly remember 10 years ago the power going out at the high school where I taught. No problem, really; The morning light was shining through the classroom and the algebra problem-solving processes were still up on the board and after a brief “oh my” moment the students went back to their problem-solving. Fast forward to 2009, where a high school classroom I was visiting (I am now an administrator) went totally in the dark as the power went out. Suddenly, teaching came to a screeching halt. The SmartBoard would not operate; the computers that the students were doing their essays on went black; the orderly atmosphere degenerated into chaos for the half hour that the power remained out as the teacher really had no idea what to do. See what I’m getting at?
An irony is that technology is supposed to help us get better connected, and yet, it seems to me that on a personal level, we are less connected than we have ever been. Why meet at Starbuck’s and talk when you can do it online? Or text? At least with telephones you still had a personal connection with the person.
I don’t know- we have clearly progressed with technology, but it seems that something has been lost along the way. It’s easier for me to shop online for my L.L. Bean outdoor gear, but you know what? I miss hearing that that customer assistant’s friendly voice on L.L. Bean’s 800 number.
May 29th, 2009 at 12:23 pm
@Clix: my total sympathies– I draft substantial comments on MS word now. Short and snappy response
: a) the implication you make that change is immune to evaluation simply because it is inevitable is not acceptable to me. b) Kids need to be *taught* to turn off technology, at the most basic of levels of tech management. We’re not doing that. c) My statement that schools place a premium on linguistic learning is nowhere near your interpretation that they do it “to the exclusion of all else.” However, I would continue to argue that what little non-linguistic learning does go on schools is not enough.
@Dave: bless your good comments and compliments as always, but I couldn’t agree with you less. Starbucks and mountains are qualitatively different, and the insights one receives in each stand a very good chance of being equally different.
@Jim: yes, yes, yes, yes. amongst other multiple reasons I balk at uncritical and overweening acceptance of tech in the classroom.
May 29th, 2009 at 10:46 pm
Just saying that it’s not unusual for me to use LLBean online to choose what I want and then to order by phone.
I think I’m with you. Love me some technology, and I may use it more than many friends, but I want to remember how to operate without it too.